And of course it deals with Classics.
My main project involves spending a great amount of time with Arrian’s Ανάβασις Αλεξάνδρου (The Campaigns of Alexander–it’s on Google Books in English [and if you like pain, 4 out of 7 of its books are on Wikisource in Greek], should you be inclined to peruse it).
Johannes Schulze, an eminent figure in the Prussian education system in the 19th century, died in 1869. This is where our story starts. The man had an incredible personal library, probably the best in Europe at the time–20326 volumes, collected over the span of his lifetime. A clever Northwestern professor heard of it and convinced Northwestern to purchase the collection, and they transported it to the States just as the war between Prussia and France started. The fact that Northwestern’s library only had 3000 volumes before they received this collection makes the acquisition so much more important; it kickstarted the library’s growth.
It’s not just the sheer size of it that makes it impressive though: it’s also what’s actually in the collection. (And of course I’ll just list the Classics ones–to be fair it is mostly Classics.) Some of the first ever examples of Greek type are in it, and the first printings of Herodotus and Aristophanes in the original Greek.
Now 20000+ volumes is a formidable number, so there has to be a much smaller focus to the project. Ever the consummate scholar and philologist, Schulze, in addition to his 80 different editions and printings of the Anabasis, translated it himself. This seems as good a point as any on which to focus. Firstly, it gives interesting insights to his scholarly interests. Secondly, it has nice parallels. As Arrian collected different accounts of Alexander’s campaigns, Schulze collected different versions of Arrian’s histories. As Arrian was the model of historiography from that point on, Leopold von Ranke, Schulze’s prodigy, was the father of historiography and of modern history. Even though the Anabasis is a formidable work in and of itself, its effects on the field of historiography and its importance to Schulze make it of more interest to me and connect it to the Schulze exhibit and the forthcoming (hopefully) publication.
Wow, that was a lot of blather! I’m just dumping all my thoughts here, hopefully to form a coherent outline by next week so I have something to show my boss, that I actually do things in my office besides hide from everyone else.
If by some bizarre chance you have anything to say about this, feel free. I’m running out of ideas.
And if for some unfathomable reason you want to read more about Schulze and the coup de bibliothèque which Germany still rues to this day, Jeff Garrett’s page is a good place to start.